Видео

PF clearly does not believe that the Ten Commandments are necessary.

Which cardinals? Aren't the big wigs of the same ilk?

Protestants will protest.

This is just lazy Catholicism. This man should know that it’s the media that’s creating confusion and ambiguity in reporting what the Supreme Pontiff says; and not the Supreme Pontiff who is being unclear or ambiguous. The Vicar of Christ has not and is not wavering from the Faith. Nor will he ever.

Bergoglio is not a valid pope. He needs to be shown the door, not corrected. No concave should ever have been called before Pope Benedict clearly and indisputably manifested a resignation from the papal munus (as required by Canon Law), through a real-time ("I hereby resign...") letter (or statement before two witnesses), accompanied by actions inseparable from manifesting a proper resignation, which would include leaving Rome to live elsewhere, resuming his pre-papal name, ceasing to wear papal garments, ceasing to wear his papal ring, ceasing to give papal blessings, and ceasing in any way whatsoever to give the appearance of acting and speaking as a pope.

Some wealthy Catholics should get together and send some private investigators to Argentina. They will dig up dirt that could get Francis in legal trouble and maybe publicize a scandal involving Francis.

I wish they would, but they might be afraid of being canceled like Bishop Strickland

If only there were 6 Princes of the Church willing to do their duty.

Yes, go for it! Pax Christi!

Stumbled on this and it's hard to watch. Two gentlemen that seem to have very closed minds!

It is unsettling how many catholics refuse to accept that it is even possible for the Pope to teach error. They call you a "schismatic" or "crypto-sede" for even suggesting this is a possibility. Who is teaching this false version of infallibility?

+JMJ 6 Cardinals holding a press conference condemning Bergoglio's errors upon errors. Dear Cardinals: You're either with the Lord or against Him.

There is a primary false base premise about "Pope" Francis. Bergoglio is and always has been an Antipope because Pope Benedict XVI never validity resigned from the Papal office due to "substantial error" in attempting to create a multiperson papal construct by declaring that he intended to only partially resign from the Papal office at a future date and time. In fact Pope Benedict XVI never did write or sign any formal letter of resignation. If he did I challenge anyone to show me that letter of resignation. Therefore the events that transpired following the declaration of a future "resignation", the conclave of 2013, and the perported election of Jorge Mario Bergoglio were all illegal in Canon law. Read Canon 188 of the Code of Canon Law. There is no mention or provision in Canon law for partial resignations from the juridical office of the Papacy, or for any other juridical office. A resignation is presumed to be a resignation form an office in its entirety, and this is clearly not what Pope Benedict XVI tried to do. The notion of "universal peaceful acceptance" can not be used to support something that is at its core a lie. This fact is best explained by Miss. Ann Elizabeth Barnhardt in her last video posted on RUclips titled "The Bergoglian Antipapacy Part 3 ENOUGH!" ruclips.net/video/2TMnb2svAww/видео.htmlsi=LnzYKV7YLycIf4jp

Amen!

Beware of false prophets and teachers, new converts guiding in error doctrine the members of the Catholic Church 😮

We need faithful priests, many jave entered to destroy the truth of the only Christian CATHOLIC CHURCH Jesus established from the Apostles ❤please be careful of Those Who are in the church that are not faithful to the church 😮 Many are going in to teach another doctrine and protestant ways that are NOT from Jesus doctrine to his children ❤

Amen!

Jesus Christ only established one Holy chosen Christian CATHOLIC CHURCH from The Apostles AND the church is the only one that made the Bible inspired by the Holy Spirit of God. The only TRUE doctrine of Christ. Jesus is the head of the body of Christ, his only chosen church

No $$$ to the usccb!

This is so obvious to the faithful from the beginning. Why are the Cardinals silent? Answer: they lost the faith.

Have mercy on me and mine and help me with the teeth and infection and pain in my teeth and chest and shoulder pain and suffering I am in and protection from the corona virus and flu and for paddy return to health and for Margaret intention and her friends and rip to the faithful departed and special intention and for georgie return to health and for all l pray for amen thank you amen protection and healing amen thank you

Bergoglio is a material HERETIC

Forget it it. They won't do it. They don't have the faith

Yes yes yes agree 100%

Yes. Absolutely agree. Ss Peter and Paul intercede for us.

❤

He could and should be if the majority of bishops weren’t infiltrating Freemasons and weren’t corrupted and the others weren’t afraid

The Cardinals should not do anything that implies recognition that Bergoglio is a valid pope.

Liberals have a problem with ALL of the 10 Commandments.

The word catholic (derived via Late Latin catholicus, from the ancient Greek adjective καθολικός (katholikos) 'universal')[3][4] comes from the Greek phrase καθόλου (katholou) 'on the whole, according to the whole, in general', and is a combination of the Greek words κατά (kata) 'about' and ὅλος (holos) 'whole'.[5][6] The first known use of "Catholic" was by the church father Saint Ignatius of Antioch in his Letter to the Smyrnaeans (circa 110 AD).[7]

What about the promises of praying the Chaplet at bedside of someone dying,saves their soul???NOT TRUE?????!!!😮

Fr. Does this also mean that Divine Mercy Sunday,does Not eradicate all the stains and sins,as it has been told??? (Reparation of all the sins ???) I'm SO CONFUSED???

Sorry, there is one church not the Papist Church but the Eastern Orthodox Church

I rebuke 100% of catholicism. I rebuke their claims to any biblical authority. I rebuke their idols and graven images, and their worship of false gods. Jesus specifically gave a command to call no man father, for we have but one Father, that is the living God. They have changed the ten commandments to suit their evil deceptions, they are of their father the devil, the father of lies.

James 4:7. Therefore submit yourself to God. Resist the devil and he will flee from you.

Exactly! Bravo -- THANK YOU for speaking the TRUTH, Chris! God bless & protect you!❤

The true solution to this problem is to go back to the source of apostolic authority, which is the divine authority of Jesus Christ; and from there, ask ourselves what makes us believe that the Creator of the universe communicates with us by providing himself with a visible representative. The sacred authority of a particular personage is a question which goes beyond the framework of canon law. It concerns first, more broadly, the concept of "theocracy", and it forces us to clarify what pushes us to believe ourselves incapable of reaching the sovereign Good directly, without worrying about the grace of any creature. .

Bad captions. He said "demissionization" (not "demonization).

Dear dear....

Lumen Gentium 16 contradicts the de fide dogma formulated in Cantate Domino by Pope Eugene 4th in his ec cathedra decrees. Its fits the Vat8can definition of an infallible ex cathedra. But Vat8can 2 rejects it as it requires membership of the actual visable church. Rejection of an ex cathedra decree comes with automatic anathema. The vast majority of our clergy rejects that decree in favor of Vat 2s soteriological inlnclusivism. When church government rejects infallible church dogma there are enormous consequences.

My brothers and sisters,when applying this case,of whether a pope is a pope or is not whether a pope should or can be remove from seat, let's not be emotional,just because this present pope and his pontificate has been full of controversy, crisis and really bad, I'm just a lay Catholic,i ask,is there a provision of this in canon law,the catechism etc. Who has right to remove a reigning pope from office?,who judges a pope?will the declaration of a pope herectic or antipope done when still on the seat or after his reign by death or resignation?How do you explicitly detemine the real intention,his thought and actions to know if he is a formal or material herectic?,having follow this this propositions from all angle,even the great Theologians and Canonists has not agreed,and cannot give a specific rule on this issue. So i focus on my spiritual life, according to the teachings of the church,already laid down for us,trying to be good Christian,a good Catholic,than being disturbed,and distracted on my Christian journey,than the focus on the politics of papacy,that has been for centuries. No one has come out with objective and verifiable prove that Pope Francis was not legitimately elected,that he didn't accept the it,and that the conclave is invalid and illegitimate. Questions that demand answers!

1:50 sqq. -- Whether or not a Pope can be deposed according to Suárez was fully analysed by Francesco Spanedda in ‘L’ecclesiologia di Francesco Suárez’ (1937). A pope who becomes a heretic or an apostate or a schismatic and is incorrigible or relapsing or contumacious cannot be judged by any court ("Prima Sedes a nemine iudicatur" = "The First See is judged by no one"); but he can and must be declared unworthy of the Pontificate and deposed by the Church, more specifically, by the Bishops of the whole world, gathered in a council or synod(s) (page 83). In Suárez, "sententia" does not mean "(court) ruling", but "(solemn) statement": cf. his 'Tractatus de Fide', disp. 10, sec. 16, n. 6 (in: Opera omnia, ed. Vivès, t. 12, p. 317.)

29:40 sqq. -- Whether or not a Pope can be deposed according to Suárez was fully analysed by Francesco Spanedda in ‘L’ecclesiologia di Francesco Suárez’ (1937). A pope who becomes a heretic or an apostate or a schismatic and is incorrigible or relapsing or contumacious cannot be judged by any court ("Prima Sedes a nemine iudicatur" = "The First See is judged by no one"); but he can and must be declared unworthy of the Pontificate and deposed by the Church, more specifically, by the Bishops of the whole world, gathered in a council or synod(s) (page 83). In Suárez, "sententia" does not mean "(court) ruling", but "(solemn) statement": cf. his 'Tractatus de Fide', disp. 10, sec. 16, n. 6 (in: Opera omnia, ed. Vivès, t. 12, p. 317.)

I highly recommend Fr. Ripperger book : The Limits of Papal Authority over the Liturgy! Do your own research. We are not to judge this pope. He belongs to Jesus. We must pray for him for the church but MORE! KNOW YOUR FAITH AND WHY WE BELIEVE. Pray for our good and holy priests! pray for HOLY Father! Time is so short! Do it now!

Opposed is not disobedience. Backed by the Pope doesn’t meet the standard for ex cathedra. The bishops should be calling a conclave NOT a synod and I unity speak to the heretical parts of the documents. We must love and pray for the Pope but respectfully resist errors which go against GODs established precepts. They cannot be changed. They aren’t ours to change. Not can the Holy Father change them.

All he has to do is forbid use of all diocesan buildings and no sacraments ministered in Latin Rite - game over. It’s not just the Holy Mass gentlemen.

Thank you for clarifying this Father.

What about the current pope isn’t he in heresy by publicly committing heresy by saying the things he been saying.

All lies…Ratzinger obviously did not mean such a thing…taken out of context.

Francis. Okay 😂